![]() ![]() Note, make a short cut of ImageJ from the folder onto your desktop. ![]() If your computer does not have Java installed, download the ImageJ bundled with Java, unzip the folder and run ImageJ from within the folder. If your computer has java installed download the platform independent version, unzip the folder and launch ImageJ from within the folder. The missing case is universal launcher on x86 Mac, which I might be able to try this weekend.For ImageJ Go to and note, you can now run the Online version at it will run independent of your computer, this is the preferred method. So from where I sit, a universal imagej-macosx for Fiji with native JRE inside is the best for Apple Silicon Macs, but all cases work fine, as long as a system Java exists. While adoptopen vs 1_zulu uses the included zulu.) So adoptopen vs zulu results in wrong architecture error and system java. (Also, if anyone is curious, if you put both an x86 and arm64 JRE in Fiji.app/java it's alphabetical. Normal launch (<4 s), no issues, 1 Fiji in dock my universal imagej-macosx (x86/arm64), with native Azul 11 JRE inside Fiji.app: System Java fallback, launches Fiji, No issues. my universal imagej-macosx (x86/arm64), with no JRE: Wrong architecture error, system Java fallback, launches Fiji, No issues. my universal imagej-macosx (x86/arm64), with current official JRE (x86): current official imagej-macosx (x86), with native JRE inside Fiji.app (Azul 11 in my case): Launches Fiji after fallback to System Java. current official imagej-macosx (x86), with no JRE and native system Java (Azul 11 in my case): ![]() current official imagej-macosx (x86), with current official JRE (x86):Ģ. It works fine with the following behavior when launched from the command line to monitor errors (there's some warnings too regarding patcher/injector, but they seem of no issue):ġ. I've tested this binary on my Apple Silicon M1 Mac. ~/dev/imagej-launcher > lipo -info ImageJ-macosxĪrchitectures in the fat file: ImageJ-macosx are: x86_64 arm64` The project compiled with no issue and the binary is universal: I also had some Java path issues, which may be a Big Sur thing. I made a fork () and tweaked CMakeLists.txt to provide the two arch for cmake (to make a universal binary). ![]() This is also supported by cmake, which I was pleased to see is used by the imagej-launcher. It does report an architecture mismatch error and does a fallback to system Java, which results in a 2nd Fiji icon in the dock-minor inconvenience.Īs noted in the thread, Apple docs show you can build for a different architecture than you run (can't test obviously) and can build universal binaries. Non-fat file: ImageJ-macosx is architecture: x86_64 Applications/Fiji.app/Contents/MacOS> lipo -info ImageJ-macosx The existing launcher actually works-despite being x86. (The normal Mac OS install also works fine in Rosetta, but is markedly slower.) I have Azul 11, but native OpenJDK is also available via homebrew, and use of the "No JRE" Fiji. So for Fiji/imagej the key is native JRE. … I've started a image.sc thread regarding getting things to work smoothly *native* rather than in Rosetta emulation.Įverything works when architectures are matched, so everything emulated or everything native. I've been using Fiji on an Apple Silicon M1 (arm64) MacBook Pro (Big Sur 11.4) I’m clearly missing a step, and I’m wondering whether someone can help me figure out what it is / how to get this bundle to run using the native openJDK. However, when I click the Fiji.app, it still asks me to enable Rosetta. I presume brew is smart enough to install only a native JDK? I’ve installed openJDK with brew install openjdk. install a native JRE from brew or Azul.download Fiji-noJRE, which I have done, from here, and.I do not get any error messages or anything indicating why it won’t open. It downloads successfully but it fails to open. I recently received a new M1 Macbook Pro (2020) running MacOS 11.5 (Big Sur) from work and have been trying to download Fiji. I am attempting to use ImageJ for some image analysis for my work. Fiji not opening on M1 Macbook Pro (2020) Usage & IssuesĪpologies if this is the incorrect place and my poor wording of my problem as I am not the most tech savvy individual but I will do my best. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |